PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSB vs. UYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSB vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSB achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than UYLD's 1.91% return.


TUSB

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.09%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UYLD

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.37%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSB vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TUSB
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
1.78%4.14%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
1.91%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSB and UYLD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSB vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSB
TUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

UYLD
UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSB vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUSBUYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-12.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.24

4.35

-2.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.74

38.06

-19.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

79.65

225.76

-146.12

TUSB vs. UYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSB Sharpe Ratio is 5.03, which is lower than the UYLD Sharpe Ratio of 8.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSB and UYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUSBUYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03

8.00

-2.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.73

5.98

-2.25

Drawdowns

TUSB vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.51%, smaller than the maximum UYLD drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSB and UYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSBUYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.54%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-0.14%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.01%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.03%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.02%

+0.04%

Volatility

TUSB vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) is 0.33%, while Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that TUSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSBUYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.38%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.66%

0.50%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92%

0.65%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.25%

1.00%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.25%

1.00%

+0.25%

TUSB vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUSB vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison

TUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than UYLD's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TUSB
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.26%3.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
5.03%5.07%4.97%5.92%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSB and UYLD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UYLD has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to TUSB (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSB dropped -0.51% vs UYLD's -0.54%.

On 1-year performance, UYLD leads with 5.18% vs 4.62% for TUSB. On fees, TUSB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UYLD has performed better with a 5.18% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TUSB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for UYLD.

UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 4.26% for TUSB.

They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TUSB and 0.29% for UYLD.

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.00 vs 5.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSB and UYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer