PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSB vs. TBUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSB vs. TBUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSB achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly higher than TBUX's 1.65% return.


TUSB

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.09%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBUX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.09%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSB vs. TBUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TUSB and TBUX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSB vs. TBUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSB
TUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

TBUX
TBUX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TBUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TBUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSB vs. TBUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) and T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUSBTBUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.24

3.08

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.74

39.71

-20.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

79.65

170.19

-90.55

TUSB vs. TBUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSB Sharpe Ratio is 5.03, which is comparable to the TBUX Sharpe Ratio of 7.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSB and TBUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUSBTBUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.03

7.13

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.73

3.89

-0.16

Drawdowns

TUSB vs. TBUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.51%, smaller than the maximum TBUX drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSB and TBUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSBTBUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-1.79%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-0.12%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-0.04%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.28%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.03%

+0.03%

Volatility

TUSB vs. TBUX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) has a higher volatility of 0.33% compared to T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (TBUX) at 0.19%. This indicates that TUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSBTBUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.33%

0.19%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.66%

0.43%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92%

0.67%

+0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.25%

1.07%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.25%

1.07%

+0.18%

TUSB vs. TBUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TBUX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TUSB vs. TBUX - Dividend Comparison

TUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than TBUX's 4.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TBUX
T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
4.48%4.67%5.39%4.66%2.58%0.27%
TUSB
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.26%3.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSB and TBUX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUSB has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to TBUX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSB dropped -0.51% vs TBUX's -1.79%.

On 1-year performance, TBUX leads with 4.77% vs 4.62% for TUSB. On fees, TBUX is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, TBUX has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TBUX has performed better with a 4.77% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBUX is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TUSB.

TBUX has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 4.26% for TUSB.

They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TUSB and 0.17% for TBUX.

TBUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.13 vs 5.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSB and TBUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer