PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUSB vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUSB vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TUSB having a 2.58% return and IBIC slightly higher at 2.69%.


TUSB

1D
0.06%
1M
0.47%
6M
2.07%
YTD
2.58%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.76%

IBIC

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.23%
6M
2.39%
YTD
2.69%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04M$835.24K$534.47K
$669.76K$810.48K$941.31K

TUSB vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TUSB and IBIC is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUSB vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TUSB
TUSB Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TUSB vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUSBIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.15

2.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

18.79

15.99

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

74.19

54.88

+19.31

TUSB vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSB Sharpe Ratio is 4.80, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSB and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUSB vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSB drawdown since its inception was -0.51%, smaller than the maximum IBIC drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSB and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUSBIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.90%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.25%

-0.27%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.06%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.10%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.08%

-0.02%

Volatility

TUSB vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF (TUSB) has a higher volatility of 0.26% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.23%. This indicates that TUSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUSBIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

0.23%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.72%

0.69%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97%

0.89%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.23%

1.54%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.23%

1.54%

-0.31%

TUSB vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TUSB vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

TUSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than IBIC's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
4.62%4.43%4.65%0.83%
TUSB
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.26%3.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUSB and IBIC have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUSB has higher volatility (0.26%) compared to IBIC (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSB dropped -0.51% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, TUSB leads with 4.55% vs 4.14% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TUSB has performed better with a 4.55% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TUSB.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 4.26% for TUSB.

TUSB is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TUSB and 0.10% for IBIC.

TUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.80 vs 4.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUSB and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer