PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TURF vs. TCAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TURF vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TURF achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than TCAF's 6.51% return.


TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TCAF

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.54%
YTD
6.51%
6M
6.60%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TURF vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TURF and TCAF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.29

TURF vs. TCAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TURF
TCAF

Basic Materials

33.9%
0.1%

Energy

29.2%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
3.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
11.4%

Financial Services

2.3%
6.0%

Industrials

1.6%
4.6%

Technology

0.4%
33.7%

Utilities

0.3%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.6%

Healthcare

-

17.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Basic Materials

TURF
33.9%
TCAF
0.1%

Energy

TURF
29.2%
TCAF
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

TURF
8.5%
TCAF
3.3%

Communication Services

TURF
3.8%
TCAF
11.4%

Financial Services

TURF
2.3%
TCAF
6.0%

Industrials

TURF
1.6%
TCAF
4.6%

Technology

TURF
0.4%
TCAF
33.7%

Utilities

TURF
0.3%
TCAF
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TURF

-

TCAF
10.6%

Healthcare

TURF

-

TCAF
17.3%

Real Estate

TURF

-

TCAF
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TURF vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TURF

TCAF
TCAF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TCAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCAF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TCAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCAF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TURF vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TURF vs. TCAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TURFTCAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

1.26

+1.26

Drawdowns

TURF vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TURF drawdown since its inception was -6.84%, smaller than the maximum TCAF drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TURF and TCAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TURFTCAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-16.37%

+9.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.54%

-0.97%

-1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-2.06%

+0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

Volatility

TURF vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TURFTCAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.50%

11.47%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

13.94%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

13.94%

+2.56%

TURF vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TURF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

TURF vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison

TURF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than TCAF's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
0.47%0.50%0.43%0.26%
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
1.25%1.49%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TURF and TCAF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TCAF is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TCAF is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TURF.

TURF has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.47% for TCAF.

TURF is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TURF and 0.31% for TCAF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TURF and TCAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer