PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUR vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUR vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUR achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TUR has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 2.47%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


TUR

1D
-2.34%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
13.80%
6M
16.84%
1Y
30.29%
3Y*
10.24%
5Y*
14.80%
10Y*
2.47%

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUR vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
13.80%-1.54%12.91%-8.83%105.75%-27.41%-1.19%14.49%-41.46%37.58%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TUR and IWM is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008

0.42

The correlation between TUR and IWM shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUR vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUR
IWM

Industrials

25.7%
17.1%

Financial Services

15.3%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

13.7%
2.1%

Basic Materials

11.5%
4.5%

Energy

6.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
7.8%

Communication Services

3.2%
2.0%

Healthcare

2.0%
15.8%

Utilities

1.7%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.2%
5.7%

Technology

0.8%
19.5%

Industrials

TUR
25.7%
IWM
17.1%

Financial Services

TUR
15.3%
IWM
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

TUR
13.7%
IWM
2.1%

Basic Materials

TUR
11.5%
IWM
4.5%

Energy

TUR
6.2%
IWM
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TUR
5.0%
IWM
7.8%

Communication Services

TUR
3.2%
IWM
2.0%

Healthcare

TUR
2.0%
IWM
15.8%

Utilities

TUR
1.7%
IWM
3.0%

Real Estate

TUR
1.2%
IWM
5.7%

Technology

TUR
0.8%
IWM
19.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUR vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUR
TUR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUR vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TURIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.56

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.67

12.64

-6.98

TUR vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUR Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUR and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TURIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

2.05

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.27

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.48

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.37

-0.33

Drawdowns

TUR vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUR drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUR and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TURIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.34%

-59.05%

-13.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.07%

-11.03%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.63%

-27.50%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

-31.91%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.25%

-41.13%

-18.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.38%

-1.49%

-26.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.90%

-10.77%

-29.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

3.10%

+2.26%

Volatility

TUR vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) has a higher volatility of 14.14% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that TUR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TURIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.14%

5.75%

+8.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

13.53%

+6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.40%

19.20%

+6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.16%

22.52%

+11.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.39%

23.04%

+11.35%

TUR vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUR vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

TUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%
TUR
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF
2.11%2.40%1.79%4.43%1.97%4.22%0.87%3.29%4.05%2.64%2.89%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUR and IWM have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUR has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUR dropped -72.34% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 10.93% vs 2.47% for TUR. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 10.93% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TUR.

TUR has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

TUR is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. TUR tracks MSCI Turkey Investable Market Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TUR and 0.19% for IWM.

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUR and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer