TUR vs. EMOP
TUR (iShares MSCI Turkey ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. TUR is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. Over the past year, TUR returned 36.03% vs 47.69% for EMOP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.
Performance
TUR vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUR achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 27.21% return.
TUR
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 17.67%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 36.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
EMOP
- 1D
- -4.78%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 28.58%
- 1Y
- 47.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUR vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF | 17.67% | 15.11% |
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 27.21% | 16.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUR and EMOP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.38 |
TUR vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUR
EMOP
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
TUR
EMOP
Financial Services
TUR
EMOP
Consumer Defensive
TUR
EMOP
Basic Materials
TUR
EMOP
Energy
TUR
EMOP
Consumer Cyclical
TUR
EMOP
Real Estate
TUR
EMOP
Utilities
TUR
EMOP
Communication Services
TUR
EMOP
Healthcare
TUR
EMOP
Technology
TUR
EMOP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUR vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank
TUR
EMOP
TUR vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUR | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.72 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 13.88 | -7.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUR vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUR drawdown since its inception was -72.34%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUR and EMOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUR | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.34% | -12.88% | -59.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.07% | -12.88% | -3.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.94% | -4.78% | -21.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.86% | -2.00% | -37.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 3.44% | +2.28% |
Volatility
TUR vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) have volatilities of 10.32% and 10.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUR | EMOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.32% | 10.76% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.48% | 19.59% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.50% | 21.65% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.16% | 21.57% | +12.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 21.57% | +12.73% |
TUR vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUR vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison
TUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than EMOP's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUR iShares MSCI Turkey ETF | 2.10% | 2.40% | 1.79% | 4.43% | 1.97% | 4.22% | 0.87% | 3.29% | 4.05% | 2.64% | 2.89% | 3.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUR and EMOP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMOP has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to TUR (10.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUR dropped -72.34% vs EMOP's -12.88%.
On 1-year performance, EMOP leads with 47.69% vs 36.03% for TUR. On fees, TUR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TUR has been the lower-risk option at 10.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMOP has performed better with a 47.69% return vs 36.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.
TUR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.85% for EMOP.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TUR and 0.70% for EMOP.
EMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUR and EMOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer