PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUNIX vs. APFPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Unconstrained Bond (TUNIX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUNIX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than APFPX's 4.00% return.


TUNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.35%
6M
2.11%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
3.56%

APFPX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
4.00%
6M
5.16%
1Y
12.02%
3Y*
9.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUNIX
Transamerica Unconstrained Bond
1.35%8.00%4.68%5.41%-2.70%
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.00%10.21%11.33%6.67%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between TUNIX and APFPX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022

-0.26

The correlation between TUNIX and APFPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (all time) to -0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUNIX vs. APFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUNIX
TUNIX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TUNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TUNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

APFPX
APFPX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
APFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Unconstrained Bond (TUNIX) and Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUNIXAPFPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.18

4.95

-2.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

7.25

-3.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

2.26

-0.77

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

13.58

-10.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.81

62.47

-48.65

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUNIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the APFPX Sharpe Ratio of 4.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUNIX and APFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUNIXAPFPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

4.95

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

3.54

-2.72

Drawdowns

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUNIX drawdown since its inception was -14.31%, which is greater than APFPX's maximum drawdown of -2.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUNIX and APFPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUNIXAPFPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.31%

-2.10%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.39%

-0.90%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.25%

-2.02%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-0.25%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.20%

+0.34%

Volatility

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Unconstrained Bond (TUNIX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund (APFPX) at 0.49%. This indicates that TUNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUNIXAPFPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

0.49%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

2.10%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

2.48%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.66%

2.76%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

2.76%

+1.41%

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUNIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than APFPX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUNIX vs. APFPX - Dividend Comparison

TUNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than APFPX's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APFPX
Artisan Global Unconstrained Fund
4.59%4.01%6.18%6.89%8.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TUNIX
Transamerica Unconstrained Bond
6.47%6.17%7.06%3.61%2.26%8.72%2.95%3.84%4.15%2.55%3.79%3.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUNIX and APFPX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUNIX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to APFPX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUNIX dropped -14.31% vs APFPX's -2.10%.

APFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.95 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUNIX and APFPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer