TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO
TULV.TO (TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF) and VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TULV.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by TD, while VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. TULV.TO is actively managed, while VGG.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TULV.TO returned 8.91%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for VGG.TO. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TULV.TO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGG.TO.
Performance
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than VGG.TO's 8.57% return.
TULV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TULV.TO TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 1.51% | 3.62% | 23.74% | -3.31% | 2.02% | 23.84% | 0.90% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 8.57% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TULV.TO and VGG.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.38 |
The correlation between TULV.TO and VGG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Healthcare
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Utilities
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Financial Services
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Communication Services
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Technology
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Industrials
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Consumer Cyclical
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
Real Estate
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
-
Basic Materials
TULV.TO
-
VGG.TO
Energy
TULV.TO
-
VGG.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TULV.TO
VGG.TO
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TULV.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.94 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 10.93 | -9.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TULV.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 2.03 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.05 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.98 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum VGG.TO drawdown of -24.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and VGG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TULV.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -24.58% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.56% | -7.07% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.39% | -15.56% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -18.52% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | 0.00% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.61% | -2.93% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 1.89% | +0.94% |
Volatility
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) at 2.59%. This indicates that TULV.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TULV.TO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 2.59% | +2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 7.86% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.44% | 10.23% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 12.63% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 14.97% | -3.35% |
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGG.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TULV.TO vs. VGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VGG.TO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TULV.TO TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 1.80% | 1.80% | 1.48% | 1.96% | 1.57% | 1.37% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TULV.TO and VGG.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TULV.TO.
TULV.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGG.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: TD and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TULV.TO and 0.30% for VGG.TO.
Find the right allocation for TULV.TO and VGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer