PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TULV.TO achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than TGED.TO's 18.74% return.


TULV.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.51%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*

TGED.TO

1D
0.46%
1M
7.40%
YTD
18.74%
6M
16.61%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
17.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
1.51%3.62%23.74%-3.31%2.02%23.84%0.90%
TGED.TO
TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF
18.74%10.63%38.60%23.33%-14.27%20.42%18.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TULV.TO and TGED.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.16

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TULV.TO
TGED.TO

Consumer Defensive

24.9%
1.5%

Healthcare

20.4%
10.5%

Utilities

17.7%
0.2%

Financial Services

12.6%
11.4%

Communication Services

11.6%
6.4%

Technology

8.8%
29.5%

Industrials

3.4%
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

0.6%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
3.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.2%

Energy

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

TULV.TO
24.9%
TGED.TO
1.5%

Healthcare

TULV.TO
20.4%
TGED.TO
10.5%

Utilities

TULV.TO
17.7%
TGED.TO
0.2%

Financial Services

TULV.TO
12.6%
TGED.TO
11.4%

Communication Services

TULV.TO
11.6%
TGED.TO
6.4%

Technology

TULV.TO
8.8%
TGED.TO
29.5%

Industrials

TULV.TO
3.4%
TGED.TO
25.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TULV.TO
0.6%
TGED.TO
4.2%

Real Estate

TULV.TO
0.1%
TGED.TO
3.7%

Basic Materials

TULV.TO

-

TGED.TO
2.2%

Energy

TULV.TO

-

TGED.TO
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TULV.TO
TULV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TULV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TGED.TO
TGED.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TGED.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGED.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) and TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TULV.TOTGED.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.33

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.82

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

10.39

-8.55

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TULV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the TGED.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TULV.TO and TGED.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TULV.TOTGED.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.88

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

1.10

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.02

-0.31

Drawdowns

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TULV.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum TGED.TO drawdown of -26.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TULV.TO and TGED.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TULV.TOTGED.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-26.19%

+14.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-10.76%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.39%

-19.41%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

-23.05%

+11.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-1.05%

-4.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-4.66%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.92%

-0.09%

Volatility

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF (TULV.TO) is 4.79%, while TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF (TGED.TO) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that TULV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGED.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TULV.TOTGED.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

6.39%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

13.28%

-5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.44%

16.12%

-5.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

15.78%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.62%

16.78%

-5.16%

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TULV.TO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TGED.TO's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

TULV.TO vs. TGED.TO - Dividend Comparison

TULV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than TGED.TO's 3.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TGED.TO
TD Active Global Enhanced Dividend ETF
3.31%3.79%3.01%3.97%4.70%3.44%3.63%2.54%
TULV.TO
TD Q U.S. Low Volatility ETF
1.80%1.80%1.48%1.96%1.57%1.37%0.83%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TULV.TO and TGED.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TULV.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TULV.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for TGED.TO.

TULV.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TGED.TO is Global Equity Income. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TULV.TO and 0.72% for TGED.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TULV.TO and TGED.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer