PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUG vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUG vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUG vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


TUG

1D
3.35%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
-6.31%
6M
-3.64%
1Y
22.12%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TUG vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TUG vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG
TUG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGDWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.55

TUG vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGDWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

Dividends

TUG vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
1.83%1.75%4.97%1.34%1.14%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TUG vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and DWAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGDWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

0.00%

-22.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.37%

0.00%

-9.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

0.00%

-4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

Volatility

TUG vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGDWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

0.00%

+22.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

0.00%

+18.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

0.00%

+18.08%