PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTXU vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTXU vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TTXU) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTXU achieves a 50.42% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.95% return.


TTXU

1D
6.45%
1M
-5.48%
6M
64.81%
YTD
50.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CAOS

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.30%
6M
0.18%
YTD
0.95%
1Y
1.98%
3Y*
3.63%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTXU vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TTXU and CAOS is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTXU vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTXU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTXU vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TTXU) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTXUCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

TTXU vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTXU vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTXU drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTXU and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTXUCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.47%

-3.89%

-47.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.10%

-0.95%

-15.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.09%

-0.92%

-21.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

Volatility

TTXU vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTXUCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.63%

1.56%

+62.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.63%

4.19%

+59.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.63%

4.19%

+59.44%

TTXU vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTXU vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

TTXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTXU and CAOS have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TTXU.

TTXU has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

TTXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TTXU and 0.63% for CAOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTXU and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer