TTXU vs. CAOS
TTXU (Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TTXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Information Technology Top 5 Equal Capped Index, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. TTXU is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.26, they often move in opposite directions. TTXU charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
TTXU vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTXU achieves a 50.42% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.95% return.
TTXU
- 1D
- 6.45%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- 6M
- 64.81%
- YTD
- 50.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 1.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.80%
TTXU vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 50.42% | -14.75% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.95% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTXU and CAOS is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | -0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTXU vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
TTXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CAOS
TTXU vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF (TTXU) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTXU | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTXU vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTXU drawdown since its inception was -51.47%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTXU and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTXU | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.47% | -3.89% | -47.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.10% | -0.95% | -15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.09% | -0.92% | -21.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility
TTXU vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTXU | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.63% | 1.56% | +62.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.63% | 4.19% | +59.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.63% | 4.19% | +59.44% |
TTXU vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTXU has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTXU vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
TTXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTXU Direxion Daily Technology Top 5 Bull 2X ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTXU and CAOS have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TTXU.
TTXU has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
TTXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TTXU and 0.63% for CAOS.
Find the right allocation for TTXU and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer