TTT vs. TSYW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW).

TTT and TSYW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TTT is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%). It was launched on Mar 27, 2012. TSYW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Nov 12, 2025.

Performance

TTT vs. TSYW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TTT vs. TSYW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury	1.05%	7.05%
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	-0.81%	-2.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTT achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly higher than TSYW's -0.81% return.

TTT

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 6.63%
• 1Y: 7.37%
• 3Y*: 12.83%
• 5Y*: 15.07%
• 10Y*: -2.26%

TSYW

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -0.81%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTT vs. TSYW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYW's 0.99% expense ratio.

TSYW

Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF

TTT

UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury

Return for Risk

TTT vs. TSYW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTT

TTT Risk / Return Rank: 18
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTT vs. TSYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTT	TSYW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTT	TSYW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	-0.80	+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between TTT and TSYW is -0.97. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

TTT vs. TSYW - Dividend Comparison

TTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.57%, more than TSYW's 4.88% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury	9.57%	9.87%	4.86%	12.15%	0.34%	0.00%	0.29%	1.88%	0.44%
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	4.88%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TTT vs. TSYW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTT drawdown since its inception was -94.00%, which is greater than TSYW's maximum drawdown of -6.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTT and TSYW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTT	TSYW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.00%	-6.69%	-87.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-81.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.81%	-5.24%	-73.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-70.26%	-2.94%	-67.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TTT	TSYW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.37%	11.16%	+23.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.26%	11.16%	+36.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.47%	11.16%	+32.31%