PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTPX.DE achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than XZMJ.DE's 13.09% return.


TTPX.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
-2.69%
6M
9.26%
YTD
16.32%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
18.70%
10Y*
13.40%

XZMJ.DE

1D
-2.48%
1M
-3.92%
6M
7.93%
YTD
13.09%
1Y
29.07%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TTPX.DE
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc)
16.32%27.49%21.75%32.48%-4.73%10.61%5.85%16.07%-15.31%
XZMJ.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C
13.09%10.86%16.16%14.57%-16.10%7.03%9.17%26.79%-26.96%

Correlation

The correlation between TTPX.DE and XZMJ.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.81

The correlation between TTPX.DE and XZMJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTPX.DE
TTPX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TTPX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

XZMJ.DE
XZMJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZMJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTPX.DEXZMJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

2.29

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.65

7.46

+7.19

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTPX.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the XZMJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTPX.DE and XZMJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTPX.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than XZMJ.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTPX.DE and XZMJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTPX.DEXZMJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-30.29%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-12.62%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-18.78%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.65%

-21.51%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-6.88%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-9.87%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.89%

-1.03%

Volatility

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE) is 6.03%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZMJ.DE) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that TTPX.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZMJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTPX.DEXZMJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

6.75%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

17.79%

-2.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.47%

21.75%

-2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

17.50%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

19.99%

-1.84%

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTPX.DE has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XZMJ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTPX.DE vs. XZMJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTPX.DE nor XZMJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TTPX.DE and XZMJ.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XZMJ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZMJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for TTPX.DE.

TTPX.DE tracks TOPIX Index (EUR Hedged), while XZMJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan Low Carbon SRI Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for TTPX.DE and 0.20% for XZMJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTPX.DE and XZMJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer