TTMX vs. INTW
TTMX (Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TTMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.
Performance
TTMX vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TTMX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -49.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- -47.68%
- 6M
- 152.57%
- YTD
- 259.86%
- 1Y
- 991.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 233.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $147.32M | $136.96M | $217.62M | |
| $169.09K | $148.71K | $143.30K |
TTMX vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TTMX Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF | -64.07% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | -61.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTMX and INTW is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTMX vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
TTMX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
TTMX vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF (TTMX) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTMX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 13.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 36.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTMX vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTMX drawdown since its inception was -71.86%, roughly equal to the maximum INTW drawdown of -69.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTMX and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTMX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.86% | -69.16% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -69.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.07% | -62.96% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.80% | -30.60% | -14.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.56% | — |
Volatility
TTMX vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTMX | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 48.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 117.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 210.83% | 157.38% | +53.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 210.83% | 150.65% | +60.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 210.83% | 150.65% | +60.18% |
TTMX vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTMX vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither TTMX nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TTMX and INTW have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TTMX is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TTMX is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.
TTMX and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TTMX and 1.50% for INTW.
Find the right allocation for TTMX and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer