TTMX vs. ARCX

Last updated Aug 3, 2026

TTMX (Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF) and ARCX (Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TTMX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for ARCX.

Performance

TTMX vs. ARCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF (TTMX) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TTMX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -49.92%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

ARCX

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -18.30%
• 6M: -69.54%
• YTD: -73.15%
• 1Y: -87.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -89.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	$474.65K	$398.88K	$951.49K
TTMX Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF	$169.09K	$148.71K	$143.30K

TTMX vs. ARCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TTMX Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF	-64.07%
ARCX Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF	-10.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TTMX and ARCX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

TTMX vs. ARCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARCX

ARCX Risk / Return Rank: 3
ARCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ARCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ARCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ARCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ARCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTMX vs. ARCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long TTMI Daily ETF (TTMX) and Tradr 2X Long ACHR Daily ETF (ARCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTMX	ARCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.28	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.87	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.25	—

Drawdowns

TTMX vs. ARCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTMX drawdown since its inception was -71.86%, smaller than the maximum ARCX drawdown of -94.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTMX and ARCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTMX	ARCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.86%	-94.32%	+22.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-93.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.07%	-93.90%	+29.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.80%	-68.07%	+23.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	70.97%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TTMX	ARCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	53.50%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	97.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	210.83%	140.02%	+70.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	210.83%	144.59%	+66.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	210.83%	144.59%	+66.24%

TTMX vs. ARCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTMX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARCX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTMX vs. ARCX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTMX nor ARCX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTMX and ARCX in my portfolio?

TTMX and ARCX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TTMX or ARCX?

On fees, ARCX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TTMX or ARCX?

ARCX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for TTMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TTMX or ARCX?

TTMX and ARCX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TTMX and ARCX?

Their fees differ too: 1.49% for TTMX and 1.30% for ARCX.