TTIIX vs. URTRX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TTIIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund) and URTRX (USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, TTIIX returned 11.86%/yr vs 7.77%/yr for URTRX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TTIIX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for URTRX.

Performance

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund (TTIIX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTIIX achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than URTRX's 8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, TTIIX has outperformed URTRX with an annualized return of 11.86%, while URTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.77% annualized return.

TTIIX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 7.04%
• YTD: 10.61%
• 1Y: 22.10%
• 3Y*: 17.09%
• 5Y*: 9.86%
• 10Y*: 11.86%
• ALL TIME*: 10.10%

URTRX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 5.68%
• YTD: 8.31%
• 1Y: 15.86%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 7.77%
• ALL TIME*: 7.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TTIIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TTIIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund	10.61%	20.96%	15.35%	20.75%	-17.59%	17.38%	17.22%	26.38%	-7.17%	19.39%
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	8.31%	14.78%	8.09%	13.98%	-13.23%	12.23%	9.25%	17.13%	-6.98%	16.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TTIIX and URTRX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2011	0.97

The correlation between TTIIX and URTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TTIIX vs. URTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TTIIX

TTIIX Risk / Return Rank: 67
TTIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
TTIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TTIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
TTIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
TTIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

URTRX

URTRX Risk / Return Rank: 83
URTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
URTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
URTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
URTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
URTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund (TTIIX) and USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTIIX	URTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.01	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.89	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.38	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.96	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.87	12.48	-2.61

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the URTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTIIX and URTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTIIX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, smaller than the maximum URTRX drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIIX and URTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTIIX	URTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.76%	-34.10%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-5.29%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	-9.12%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.49%	-19.52%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.76%	-23.56%	-8.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-0.35%	-1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.28%	-4.12%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	1.25%	+0.87%

Volatility

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund (TTIIX) has a higher volatility of 3.76% compared to USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund (URTRX) at 1.95%. This indicates that TTIIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTIIX	URTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.76%	1.95%	+1.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.63%	6.61%	+4.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	7.80%	+4.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.82%	9.76%	+5.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.71%	10.31%	+5.40%

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTIIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than URTRX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TTIIX vs. URTRX - Dividend Comparison

TTIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than URTRX's 6.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TTIIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund	2.50%	2.77%	2.20%	2.15%	2.29%	2.03%	1.67%	2.22%	2.63%	0.11%	2.37%	0.29%
URTRX USAA Target Retirement 2030 Fund	6.26%	6.78%	3.16%	4.24%	9.53%	7.66%	4.53%	11.43%	8.54%	8.10%	4.06%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTIIX and URTRX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, TTIIX and URTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TTIIX or URTRX?

TTIIX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to URTRX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTIIX dropped -31.76% vs URTRX's -34.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.