TTIIX vs. STLG

In the year-to-date period, TTIIX achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly lower than STLG's 35.11% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TTIIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than STLG's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund (TTIIX) and iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TTIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the STLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTIIX and STLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TTIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than STLG's 0.11% yield.

The maximum TTIIX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, roughly equal to the maximum STLG drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIIX and STLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund (TTIIX) is 2.98%, while iShares Factors US Growth Style ETF (STLG) has a volatility of 5.74%. This indicates that TTIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.