TTIHX vs. FRKMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX).
TTIHX is an actively managed fund by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 4, 2015. FRKMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 1, 2019.
Performance
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTIHX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than FRKMX's 0.42% return.
TTIHX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 31.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
FRKMX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 9.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.57%
- 10Y*
- —
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTIHX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I | -0.53% | 20.97% | 15.27% | 20.62% | -17.68% | 17.31% | 17.11% | 8.97% |
FRKMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K | 0.42% | 9.91% | 4.40% | 8.17% | -11.57% | 2.88% | 8.68% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTIHX and FRKMX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTIHX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTIHX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank
TTIHX
FRKMX
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TTIHX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 1.69 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.49 | 2.36 | +1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.34 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.29 | -0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.40 | 8.86 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TTIHX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 1.69 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.71 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTIHX drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIHX and FRKMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTIHX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.83% | -16.04% | -15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -3.42% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -16.04% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.28% | -2.29% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -3.64% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 0.88% | +1.56% |
Volatility
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) at 2.07%. This indicates that TTIHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRKMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TTIHX | FRKMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 2.07% | +3.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.07% | 2.94% | +6.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.17% | 4.63% | +9.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 5.22% | +9.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 5.13% | +10.56% |
Dividends
TTIHX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison
TTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than FRKMX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTIHX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I | 2.81% | 2.79% | 2.10% | 2.06% | 2.21% | 1.95% | 1.62% | 2.16% | 2.59% | 0.11% | 2.35% | 0.29% |
FRKMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K | 3.12% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 2.92% | 4.66% | 3.65% | 2.56% | 1.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |