TTIHX vs. FHDFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TTIHX (Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I) and FHDFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class C) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TTIHX returned 10.42%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for FHDFX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TTIHX charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for FHDFX.

Performance

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class C (FHDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TTIHX having a 11.83% return and FHDFX slightly higher at 12.28%.

TTIHX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 11.83%
• 6M: 12.99%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 19.67%
• 5Y*: 10.42%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

FHDFX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 12.28%
• 6M: 14.17%
• 1Y: 28.63%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TTIHX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I	11.83%	20.97%	15.27%	20.62%	-17.68%	17.31%	17.11%	26.16%	-12.10%
FHDFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class C	12.28%	21.40%	12.39%	19.34%	-19.85%	15.00%	16.66%	25.21%	-12.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TTIHX and FHDFX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.98

The correlation between TTIHX and FHDFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TTIHX vs. FHDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTIHX

TTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 71
TTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
TTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FHDFX

FHDFX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FHDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FHDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FHDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FHDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FHDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class C (FHDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTIHX	FHDFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.36	+0.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	3.27	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.44	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.04	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.60	13.43	+1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTIHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FHDFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTIHX and FHDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTIHX	FHDFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.36	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.58	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.63	+0.12

Drawdowns

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTIHX drawdown since its inception was -31.83%, roughly equal to the maximum FHDFX drawdown of -31.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIHX and FHDFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTIHX	FHDFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.83%	-31.40%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-9.57%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.14%	-15.69%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.56%	-28.49%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-6.29%	+1.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.17%	-0.18%

Volatility

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I (TTIHX) is 3.42%, while Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class C (FHDFX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that TTIHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTIHX	FHDFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	4.11%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	10.17%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.56%	12.50%	-0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.65%	15.06%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	16.87%	-1.14%

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTIHX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FHDFX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTIHX vs. FHDFX - Dividend Comparison

TTIHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than FHDFX's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHDFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2045 Fund Class C	3.09%	2.08%	1.65%	1.20%	5.64%	7.99%	4.46%	2.63%	2.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTIHX Nuveen Lifecycle Index 2055 Fund Class I	2.50%	2.79%	2.10%	2.06%	2.21%	1.95%	1.62%	2.16%	2.59%	0.11%	2.35%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTIHX and FHDFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, TTIHX and FHDFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TTIHX or FHDFX?

FHDFX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to TTIHX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTIHX dropped -31.83% vs FHDFX's -31.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TTIHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.