TTIFX vs. QMLFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TTIFX (Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund) and QMLFX (Quantified Market Leaders Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, TTIFX returned 2.53%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for QMLFX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTIFX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QMLFX.

Performance

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTIFX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than QMLFX's 20.58% return.

TTIFX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 2.92%
• 5Y*: 2.53%
• 10Y*: —

QMLFX

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 20.58%
• 6M: 18.12%
• 1Y: 40.42%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: 2.91%
• 10Y*: 10.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund	0.56%	6.79%	-2.91%	6.04%	0.93%	8.25%	5.13%	4.99%	-2.45%	0.84%
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	20.58%	0.97%	11.05%	15.04%	-23.59%	13.22%	37.81%	26.08%	-13.48%	15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TTIFX and QMLFX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017	0.42

The correlation between TTIFX and QMLFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TTIFX vs. QMLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTIFX

TTIFX Risk / Return Rank: 44
TTIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
TTIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TTIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TTIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
TTIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

QMLFX

QMLFX Risk / Return Rank: 52
QMLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
QMLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
QMLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
QMLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QMLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) and Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTIFX	QMLFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.72	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	2.24	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.31	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	3.92	-1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	11.06	-4.42

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the QMLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTIFX and QMLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTIFX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum QMLFX drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIFX and QMLFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTIFX	QMLFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-36.59%	+23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.11%	-10.07%	+7.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.04%	-27.21%	+18.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.04%	-34.07%	+25.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-0.29%	-1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-12.50%	+10.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	3.56%	-2.84%

Volatility

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) is 0.87%, while Quantified Market Leaders Fund (QMLFX) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that TTIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTIFX	QMLFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.87%	12.06%	-11.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.05%	17.95%	-15.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78%	23.01%	-20.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	20.63%	-14.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.88%	21.25%	-15.37%

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTIFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than QMLFX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTIFX vs. QMLFX - Dividend Comparison

TTIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than QMLFX's 1.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMLFX Quantified Market Leaders Fund	1.14%	1.37%	0.00%	1.99%	0.00%	26.84%	9.58%	0.00%	15.63%	12.15%	2.22%	1.63%
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund	2.99%	3.01%	0.00%	5.33%	0.84%	2.02%	4.71%	1.09%	0.00%	0.94%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTIFX and QMLFX in my portfolio?

TTIFX and QMLFX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTIFX or QMLFX?

QMLFX has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to TTIFX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTIFX dropped -13.21% vs QMLFX's -36.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TTIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.