TTIFX vs. AFQSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TTIFX (Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund) and AFQSX (Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, TTIFX returned 2.34%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for AFQSX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TTIFX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.70%/yr for AFQSX.

Performance

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) and Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTIFX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than AFQSX's 12.38% return.

TTIFX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 4.96%
• 3Y*: 2.79%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: —

AFQSX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 6.19%
• YTD: 12.38%
• 6M: 14.29%
• 1Y: 24.14%
• 3Y*: 6.58%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund	0.37%	6.79%	-2.91%	6.04%	0.93%	8.25%	5.13%
AFQSX Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund	12.38%	3.78%	5.83%	2.10%	-22.23%	44.62%	-23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TTIFX and AFQSX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020	0.30

The correlation between TTIFX and AFQSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TTIFX vs. AFQSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTIFX

TTIFX Risk / Return Rank: 45
TTIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TTIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TTIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TTIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
TTIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

AFQSX

AFQSX Risk / Return Rank: 81
AFQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
AFQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AFQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AFQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
AFQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) and Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TTIFX	AFQSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	2.50	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	3.81	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.57	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	4.16	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.62	15.05	-7.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the AFQSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTIFX and AFQSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TTIFX	AFQSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.93	2.50	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.00	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.00	+0.50

Drawdowns

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTIFX drawdown since its inception was -13.21%, smaller than the maximum AFQSX drawdown of -93.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTIFX and AFQSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTIFX	AFQSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.21%	-93.01%	+79.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.11%	-6.01%	+3.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.04%	-93.01%	+83.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.04%	-93.01%	+83.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.55%	-90.44%	+88.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-35.16%	+33.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.69%	1.66%	-0.97%

Volatility

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) is 0.79%, while Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that TTIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFQSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTIFX	AFQSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	2.97%	-2.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.98%	8.40%	-6.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74%	10.01%	-7.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.92%	637.17%	-631.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.90%	562.87%	-556.97%

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTIFX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than AFQSX's 1.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TTIFX vs. AFQSX - Dividend Comparison

TTIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, while AFQSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AFQSX Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund	3.00%	3.01%	0.00%	5.33%	0.84%	2.02%	4.71%	1.09%	0.00%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTIFX and AFQSX in my portfolio?

TTIFX and AFQSX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTIFX or AFQSX?

AFQSX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to TTIFX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTIFX dropped -13.21% vs AFQSX's -93.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.