PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AFQSX vs. ABRYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFQSX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than ABRYX's 18.31% return.


AFQSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.66%
YTD
10.72%
6M
10.14%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*

ABRYX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
18.31%
6M
18.88%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
4.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AFQSX
Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund
10.72%3.78%5.83%2.10%-22.23%44.62%-23.80%0.00%
ABRYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
18.31%8.50%3.34%6.34%-14.82%9.65%9.50%-0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AFQSX and ABRYX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019

0.34

The correlation between AFQSX and ABRYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AFQSX vs. ABRYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFQSX
AFQSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AFQSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFQSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFQSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AFQSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFQSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ABRYX
ABRYX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ABRYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AFQSXABRYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.52

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

6.04

-2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

19.57

-7.74

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AFQSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the ABRYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFQSX and ABRYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFQSX drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than ABRYX's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFQSX and ABRYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AFQSXABRYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.01%

-26.63%

-66.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-4.22%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.01%

-18.09%

-74.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.01%

-19.17%

-73.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.58%

-2.45%

-88.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.55%

-4.63%

-30.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.30%

+0.47%

Volatility

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund (AFQSX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) at 3.05%. This indicates that AFQSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABRYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AFQSXABRYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

3.05%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

8.18%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

9.27%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

637.17%

12.21%

+624.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

560.62%

10.92%

+549.70%

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AFQSX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ABRYX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AFQSX vs. ABRYX - Dividend Comparison

AFQSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRYX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund
3.00%3.55%13.21%2.43%0.00%25.72%1.40%6.66%0.00%6.34%4.36%7.17%
AFQSX
Alpha Fiduciary Quantitative Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AFQSX and ABRYX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AFQSX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to ABRYX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AFQSX dropped -93.01% vs ABRYX's -26.63%.

ABRYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AFQSX and ABRYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer