TTI vs. INBX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TTI (TETRA Technologies, Inc.) and INBX (Inhibrx, Inc.) are both stocks. TTI operates in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services (Energy), while INBX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, TTI returned 189.69% vs 543.41% for INBX. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TTI vs. INBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTI achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than INBX's 16.71% return.

TTI

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 189.69%
• 3Y*: 52.72%
• 5Y*: 22.11%
• 10Y*: 5.28%

INBX

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -21.83%
• YTD: 16.71%
• 6M: 15.87%
• 1Y: 543.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTI vs. INBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TTI TETRA Technologies, Inc.	10.99%	161.73%	-5.54%
INBX Inhibrx, Inc.	16.71%	412.99%	18.46%

Correlation

The correlation between TTI and INBX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2024	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap TTI : $1.43B INBX : $1.44B
EPS TTI : $0.05 INBX : -$8.40
PS Ratio TTI : 2.23 INBX : 1.10K
Total Revenue (TTM) TTI : $630.05M INBX : $1.30M
Gross Profit (TTM) TTI : $154.82M INBX : -$508.00K
EBITDA (TTM) TTI : $85.97M INBX : -$117.63M

Return for Risk

TTI vs. INBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTI

TTI Risk / Return Rank: 93
TTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
TTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TTI Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TTI Martin Ratio Rank: 92

INBX

INBX Risk / Return Rank: 98
INBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
INBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
INBX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
INBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INBX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTI vs. INBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) and Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTI	INBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.32	4.24	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	5.25	-1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.68	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	14.18	-9.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	34.82	-22.17

TTI vs. INBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTI Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is comparable to the INBX Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTI and INBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TTI vs. INBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTI drawdown since its inception was -99.27%, which is greater than INBX's maximum drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTI and INBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTI	INBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.27%	-39.84%	-59.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.66%	-38.66%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.65%	-35.00%	-30.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-55.74%	-17.07%	-38.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.07%	15.71%	-0.64%

Volatility

TTI vs. INBX - Volatility Comparison

TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) has a higher volatility of 18.32% compared to Inhibrx, Inc. (INBX) at 17.27%. This indicates that TTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTI	INBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.32%	17.27%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.03%	61.72%	-20.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.80%	129.27%	-71.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.37%	100.32%	-38.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.51%	100.32%	-24.81%

Dividends

TTI vs. INBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTI nor INBX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INBX Inhibrx, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTI TETRA Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.34%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTI and INBX in my portfolio?

TTI and INBX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTI or INBX?

TTI has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to INBX (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTI dropped -99.27% vs INBX's -39.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 3.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.