PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTEQ vs. DOGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTEQ achieves a 31.65% return, which is significantly higher than DOGG's 8.91% return.


TTEQ

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.47%
6M
28.22%
YTD
31.65%
1Y
46.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DOGG

1D
0.51%
1M
-0.46%
6M
8.28%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
31.65%24.25%0.78%
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.91%19.43%-6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TTEQ and DOGG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2024

-0.08

The correlation between TTEQ and DOGG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTEQ vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTEQ
TTEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TTEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TTEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DOGG
DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTEQDOGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.08

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

4.48

+3.64

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTEQ and DOGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTEQ drawdown since its inception was -26.97%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTEQ and DOGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTEQDOGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.97%

-11.19%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.31%

-8.29%

-9.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-4.27%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-3.27%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

3.86%

+1.84%

Volatility

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Technology ETF (TTEQ) has a higher volatility of 12.42% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 4.17%. This indicates that TTEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTEQDOGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.42%

4.17%

+8.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.35%

8.77%

+14.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.10%

11.01%

+16.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.86%

12.99%

+15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.86%

12.99%

+15.87%

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTEQ has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TTEQ vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

TTEQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%.


PositionTTM202520242023
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
8.69%8.75%9.92%5.89%
TTEQ
T. Rowe Price Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TTEQ and DOGG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTEQ has higher volatility (12.42%) compared to DOGG (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTEQ dropped -26.97% vs DOGG's -11.19%.

On 1-year performance, TTEQ leads with 46.59% vs 17.76% for DOGG. On fees, TTEQ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DOGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TTEQ has performed better with a 46.59% return vs 17.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TTEQ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DOGG.

DOGG has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 0.00% for TTEQ.

TTEQ is categorized as Technology Equities, while DOGG is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for TTEQ and 0.75% for DOGG.

TTEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTEQ and DOGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer