PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTE vs. LRLCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTE vs. LRLCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TotalEnergies SE (TTE) and L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTE achieves a 26.42% return, which is significantly higher than LRLCY's 2.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TTE has outperformed LRLCY with an annualized return of 16.01%, while LRLCY has yielded a comparatively lower 10.52% annualized return.


TTE

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.73%
6M
24.83%
YTD
26.42%
1Y
38.26%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
23.58%
10Y*
16.01%
ALL TIME*
6.71%

LRLCY

1D
-0.77%
1M
-2.42%
6M
-1.25%
YTD
2.88%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
-0.15%
5Y*
0.85%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTE vs. LRLCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
26.42%31.96%-11.58%10.48%37.55%56.52%-9.98%15.41%-2.56%12.42%
LRLCY
L'Oréal S.A.
2.88%23.82%-28.09%41.40%-24.25%26.75%31.11%31.01%5.07%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TTE and LRLCY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTE:

$179.94B

LRLCY:

$230.21B

EPS

TTE:

$6.88

LRLCY:

€4.67

PE Ratio

TTE:

11.75

LRLCY:

16.18

PEG Ratio

TTE:

9.97

LRLCY:

1.96

PS Ratio

TTE:

0.96

LRLCY:

2.32

PB Ratio

TTE:

1.42

LRLCY:

5.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTE:

$183.34B

LRLCY:

€87.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTE:

$61.59B

LRLCY:

€65.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTE:

$37.85B

LRLCY:

€20.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTE vs. LRLCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTE
TTE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

LRLCY
LRLCY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LRLCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRLCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRLCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LRLCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRLCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTE vs. LRLCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TotalEnergies SE (TTE) and L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTELRLCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.29

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

0.59

+6.26

TTE vs. LRLCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the LRLCY Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTE and LRLCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTE vs. LRLCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTE drawdown since its inception was -62.81%, which is greater than LRLCY's maximum drawdown of -59.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTE and LRLCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTELRLCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.81%

-59.55%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.08%

-16.83%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.51%

-32.42%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-39.05%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.81%

-39.05%

-23.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.58%

-9.68%

-2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-12.13%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.60%

8.31%

-2.71%

Volatility

TTE vs. LRLCY - Volatility Comparison

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to L'Oréal S.A. (LRLCY) at 6.12%. This indicates that TTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRLCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTELRLCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

6.12%

+2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.79%

21.67%

-1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.89%

27.71%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.26%

27.06%

+8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.49%

25.03%

+12.46%

Dividends

TTE vs. LRLCY - Dividend Comparison

TTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than LRLCY's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRLCY
L'Oréal S.A.
1.90%1.79%2.02%1.29%1.53%1.00%1.14%1.48%1.91%3.34%3.87%1.87%
TTE
TotalEnergies SE
4.87%9.64%9.09%4.60%8.41%27.22%10.10%6.52%4.07%4.51%4.77%5.46%

Financials

TTE vs. LRLCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TotalEnergies SE and L'Oréal S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
48.90B
21.42B
(TTE) Total Revenue
(LRLCY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TTE values in USD, LRLCY values in EUR

TTE vs. LRLCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TotalEnergies SE and L'Oréal S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
20.5%
78.7%
Portfolio components
TTE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a gross profit of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.5%.

LRLCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, L'Oréal S.A. reported a gross profit of 16.86B and revenue of 21.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.7%.

TTE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported an operating income of 10.03B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

LRLCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, L'Oréal S.A. reported an operating income of 5.14B and revenue of 21.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

TTE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, TotalEnergies SE reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 48.90B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.

LRLCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, L'Oréal S.A. reported a net income of 2.74B and revenue of 21.42B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTE and LRLCY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTE has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to LRLCY (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTE dropped -62.81% vs LRLCY's -59.55%.

TTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTE and LRLCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer