TTDKY vs. CEVA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TTDKY (TDK Corp ADR) and CEVA (CEVA, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — TTDKY in Electronic Components, CEVA in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, TTDKY returned 20.98%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for CEVA. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TDK Corp ADR (TTDKY) and CEVA, Inc. (CEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTDKY achieves a 80.24% return, which is significantly lower than CEVA's 124.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TTDKY has outperformed CEVA with an annualized return of 20.98%, while CEVA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.37% annualized return.

TTDKY

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: 19.71%
• YTD: 80.24%
• 6M: 78.97%
• 1Y: 137.29%
• 3Y*: 51.50%
• 5Y*: 26.86%
• 10Y*: 20.98%

CEVA

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: 22.77%
• YTD: 124.95%
• 6M: 124.02%
• 1Y: 134.54%
• 3Y*: 27.73%
• 5Y*: 1.84%
• 10Y*: 6.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TTDKY TDK Corp ADR	80.24%	9.92%	37.95%	45.42%	-16.86%	-22.54%	34.55%	59.89%	-11.84%	16.59%
CEVA CEVA, Inc.	124.95%	-31.79%	38.93%	-11.22%	-40.84%	-4.97%	68.77%	22.05%	-52.13%	37.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TTDKY and CEVA is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2009	0.28

The correlation between TTDKY and CEVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TTDKY : $48.28B CEVA : $1.34B
EPS TTDKY : ¥104.42 CEVA : -$0.47
PS Ratio TTDKY : 3.07 CEVA : 10.89
PB Ratio TTDKY : 3.55 CEVA : 3.96
Total Revenue (TTM) TTDKY : ¥2.54T CEVA : $112.38M
Gross Profit (TTM) TTDKY : ¥794.41B CEVA : $97.98M
EBITDA (TTM) TTDKY : ¥492.99B CEVA : -$5.96M

Return for Risk

TTDKY vs. CEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTDKY

TTDKY Risk / Return Rank: 90
TTDKY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TTDKY Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TTDKY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
TTDKY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TTDKY Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CEVA

CEVA Risk / Return Rank: 85
CEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
CEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TDK Corp ADR (TTDKY) and CEVA, Inc. (CEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TTDKY	CEVA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.11	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.59	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.33	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	3.09	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.24	6.37	+2.87

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTDKY Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the CEVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTDKY and CEVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTDKY drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, smaller than the maximum CEVA drawdown of -78.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTDKY and CEVA.

Drawdown Indicators

	TTDKY	CEVA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.04%	-78.24%	+24.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.56%	-43.87%	+11.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.71%	-55.23%	+15.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.71%	-68.24%	+28.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.75%	-78.24%	+26.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-34.68%	+32.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.46%	-38.61%	+15.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.92%	21.19%	-6.27%

Volatility

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TDK Corp ADR (TTDKY) is 21.43%, while CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) has a volatility of 29.17%. This indicates that TTDKY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TTDKY	CEVA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.43%	29.17%	-7.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.76%	49.52%	-8.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.95%	64.15%	-13.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.89%	54.51%	-15.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.24%	51.07%	-14.83%

Dividends

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTDKY nor CEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CEVA CEVA, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TTDKY TDK Corp ADR	0.00%	0.77%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.85%

Financials

TTDKY vs. CEVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between TDK Corp ADR and CEVA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TTDKY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TDK Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 187.24B and revenue of 658.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.5%.

CEVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.30M and revenue of 27.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.2%.

TTDKY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TDK Corp ADR reported an operating income of 31.48B and revenue of 658.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

CEVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.97M and revenue of 27.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.4%.

TTDKY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TDK Corp ADR reported a net income of 14.72B and revenue of 658.13B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.

CEVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported a net income of -4.46M and revenue of 27.02M, resulting in a net margin of -16.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TTDKY and CEVA in my portfolio?

TTDKY and CEVA have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TTDKY or CEVA?

CEVA has higher volatility (29.17%) compared to TTDKY (21.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTDKY dropped -54.04% vs CEVA's -78.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TTDKY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.