CEVA vs. AMBQ
CEVA (CEVA, Inc.) and AMBQ (Ambiq Micro, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEVA achieves a 124.95% return, which is significantly lower than AMBQ's 210.74% return.
CEVA
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 22.77%
- YTD
- 124.95%
- 6M
- 124.02%
- 1Y
- 134.54%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.84%
- 10Y*
- 6.37%
AMBQ
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- 8.44%
- YTD
- 210.74%
- 6M
- 186.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CEVA CEVA, Inc. | 124.95% | -6.03% |
AMBQ Ambiq Micro, Inc | 210.74% | -25.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CEVA and AMBQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.50 |
Fundamentals
CEVA:
-$0.47
AMBQ:
-$3.17
CEVA:
10.89
AMBQ:
13.10
CEVA:
$112.38M
AMBQ:
$81.84M
CEVA:
$97.98M
AMBQ:
$28.20M
CEVA:
-$5.96M
AMBQ:
-$35.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CEVA vs. AMBQ — Risk / Return Rank
CEVA
AMBQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CEVA, Inc. (CEVA) and Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CEVA | AMBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEVA drawdown since its inception was -78.24%, which is greater than AMBQ's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEVA and AMBQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEVA | AMBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.24% | -48.10% | -30.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.68% | -2.12% | -32.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -24.84% | -13.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.19% | — | — |
Volatility
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CEVA | AMBQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.15% | 90.62% | -26.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.51% | 90.62% | -36.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.07% | 90.62% | -39.55% |
Dividends
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEVA nor AMBQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CEVA, Inc. and Ambiq Micro, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CEVA vs. AMBQ - Profitability Comparison
CEVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.30M and revenue of 27.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.2%.
AMBQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a gross profit of 10.89M and revenue of 25.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.
CEVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.97M and revenue of 27.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.4%.
AMBQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported an operating income of -11.69M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -46.6%.
CEVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported a net income of -4.46M and revenue of 27.02M, resulting in a net margin of -16.5%.
AMBQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a net income of -10.17M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in a net margin of -40.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CEVA and AMBQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CEVA and AMBQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer