PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTD vs. PINS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTD vs. PINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTD achieves a -49.21% return, which is significantly lower than PINS's -21.94% return.


TTD

1D
2.01%
1M
-8.84%
YTD
-49.21%
6M
-47.39%
1Y
-71.63%
3Y*
-37.11%
5Y*
-20.31%
10Y*

PINS

1D
-6.00%
1M
3.80%
YTD
-21.94%
6M
-22.24%
1Y
-40.28%
3Y*
-5.89%
5Y*
-21.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTD vs. PINS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TTD
The Trade Desk, Inc.
-49.21%-67.70%63.33%60.52%-51.08%14.41%208.34%30.68%
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
-21.94%-10.72%-21.71%52.55%-33.20%-44.84%253.54%-21.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TTD and PINS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.56

The correlation between TTD and PINS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TTD:

$9.19B

PINS:

$12.87B

EPS

TTD:

$0.89

PINS:

$0.50

PE Ratio

TTD:

21.71

PINS:

40.78

PEG Ratio

TTD:

0.28

PINS:

0.21

PS Ratio

TTD:

3.16

PINS:

3.12

PB Ratio

TTD:

3.75

PINS:

4.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTD:

$2.97B

PINS:

$4.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTD:

$2.31B

PINS:

$3.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTD:

$725.01M

PINS:

$351.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTD vs. PINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTD
TTD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTD Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTD Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PINS
PINS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTD vs. PINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTDPINSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

0.86

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

-0.67

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-1.15

-0.13

TTD vs. PINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTD Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the PINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTD and PINS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTD vs. PINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTD drawdown since its inception was -86.45%, roughly equal to the maximum PINS drawdown of -82.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTD and PINS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTDPINSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.45%

-82.70%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.94%

-60.63%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.45%

-65.72%

-20.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.45%

-80.79%

-5.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.18%

-77.33%

-8.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.27%

-52.34%

+25.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

56.84%

35.29%

+21.55%

Volatility

TTD vs. PINS - Volatility Comparison

The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) has a higher volatility of 18.89% compared to Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) at 14.23%. This indicates that TTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTDPINSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.89%

14.23%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.21%

38.04%

+3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.24%

49.60%

+14.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.34%

55.83%

+11.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.43%

61.16%

+7.27%

Dividends

TTD vs. PINS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TTD nor PINS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TTD vs. PINS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Trade Desk, Inc. and Pinterest, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
688.86M
1.01B
(TTD) Total Revenue
(PINS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTD vs. PINS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Trade Desk, Inc. and Pinterest, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

72.0%74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%84.0%20222023202420252026
73.6%
76.3%
Portfolio components
TTD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 506.89M and revenue of 688.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.6%.

PINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a gross profit of 768.96M and revenue of 1.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.3%.

TTD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported an operating income of 66.65M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.7%.

PINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported an operating income of -80.29M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in an operating margin of -8.0%.

TTD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Trade Desk, Inc. reported a net income of 40.00M and revenue of 688.86M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.

PINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinterest, Inc. reported a net income of -73.59M and revenue of 1.01B, resulting in a net margin of -7.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTD and PINS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTD has higher volatility (18.89%) compared to PINS (14.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTD dropped -86.45% vs PINS's -82.70%.

PINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTD and PINS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer