PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TTAN vs. BRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TTAN vs. BRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TTAN achieves a -39.73% return, which is significantly lower than BRO's -23.82% return.


TTAN

1D
2.59%
1M
1.61%
YTD
-39.73%
6M
-41.59%
1Y
-38.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRO

1D
3.71%
1M
4.46%
YTD
-23.82%
6M
-24.07%
1Y
-45.06%
3Y*
-2.44%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TTAN vs. BRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TTAN
ServiceTitan, Inc
-39.73%3.53%1.85%
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-23.82%-21.37%-2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TTAN and BRO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.12

Fundamentals

EPS

TTAN:

-$246.61

BRO:

$4.76

PS Ratio

TTAN:

0.02

BRO:

2.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

TTAN:

$269.57B

BRO:

$6.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TTAN:

$194.32B

BRO:

$3.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

TTAN:

-$25.80B

BRO:

$1.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TTAN vs. BRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAN
TTAN Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TTAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTAN Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TTAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTAN Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TTAN vs. BRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TTANBRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

0.70

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.89

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-1.46

+0.21

TTAN vs. BRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is higher than the BRO Sharpe Ratio of -1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAN and BRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TTAN vs. BRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAN drawdown since its inception was -57.26%, roughly equal to the maximum BRO drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAN and BRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TTANBRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.26%

-55.85%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.78%

-50.55%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.38%

-50.96%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.02%

-13.57%

-10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.73%

30.94%

-0.21%

Volatility

TTAN vs. BRO - Volatility Comparison

ServiceTitan, Inc (TTAN) has a higher volatility of 19.50% compared to Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) at 8.14%. This indicates that TTAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TTANBRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.50%

8.14%

+11.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.13%

21.98%

+20.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.38%

28.66%

+22.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.68%

24.89%

+25.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.68%

23.71%

+26.97%

Dividends

TTAN vs. BRO - Dividend Comparison

TTAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.07%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%
TTAN
ServiceTitan, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TTAN vs. BRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ServiceTitan, Inc and Brown & Brown, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
268.82B
1.90B
(TTAN) Total Revenue
(BRO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TTAN vs. BRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ServiceTitan, Inc and Brown & Brown, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
72.1%
52.3%
Portfolio components
TTAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a gross profit of 193.79B and revenue of 268.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

BRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

TTAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported an operating income of -25.76B and revenue of 268.82B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.6%.

BRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TTAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ServiceTitan, Inc reported a net income of -22.82B and revenue of 268.82B, resulting in a net margin of -8.5%.

BRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TTAN and BRO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTAN has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to BRO (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TTAN dropped -57.26% vs BRO's -55.85%.

TTAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.75 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TTAN and BRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer