TSYY vs. QDTY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and QDTY (YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while QDTY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -15.32% vs 22.30% for QDTY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for QDTY.

Performance

TSYY vs. QDTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -20.53% return, which is significantly lower than QDTY's 9.62% return.

TSYY

• 1D: -2.37%
• 1M: -5.02%
• 6M: -19.96%
• YTD: -20.53%
• 1Y: -15.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -24.10%

QDTY

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -4.80%
• 6M: 8.04%
• YTD: 9.62%
• 1Y: 22.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYY vs. QDTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF	-20.53%	-20.71%
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	9.62%	12.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYY and QDTY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.56

The correlation between TSYY and QDTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSYY vs. QDTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSYY

TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 5
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QDTY

QDTY Risk / Return Rank: 49
QDTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
QDTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
QDTY Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QDTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
QDTY Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYY vs. QDTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSYY	QDTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	1.26	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	1.73	-2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.22	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	2.02	-2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	6.73	-7.63

TSYY vs. QDTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSYY Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the QDTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSYY and QDTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSYY vs. QDTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than QDTY's maximum drawdown of -23.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and QDTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSYY	QDTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.52%	-23.45%	-18.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.54%	-11.10%	-18.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.68%	-5.80%	-33.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.72%	-4.40%	-22.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.09%	3.32%	+13.77%

Volatility

TSYY vs. QDTY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) have volatilities of 7.13% and 7.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSYY	QDTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	7.23%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.18%	14.82%	+3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.15%	17.86%	+12.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.66%	26.05%	+10.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.66%	26.05%	+10.61%

TSYY vs. QDTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QDTY's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSYY vs. QDTY - Dividend Comparison

TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 250.98%, more than QDTY's 34.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	34.62%	26.82%	0.00%
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF	250.98%	256.64%	0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSYY and QDTY in my portfolio?

TSYY and QDTY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSYY or QDTY?

QDTY has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to TSYY (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs QDTY's -23.45%.

Which ETF is better, TSYY or QDTY?

On 1-year performance, QDTY leads with 22.30% vs -15.32% for TSYY. On fees, QDTY is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSYY or QDTY?

Over the 1-year period, QDTY has performed better with a 22.30% return vs -15.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSYY or QDTY?

QDTY is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSYY or QDTY?

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 250.98%, compared with 34.62% for QDTY.

What is the main difference between TSYY and QDTY?

TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QDTY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 1.01% for QDTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QDTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.