TSYY vs. PEPS
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.29% vs 31.83% for PEPS. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
TSYY vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.67% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEPS
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.67% | 20.32% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and PEPS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between TSYY and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
PEPS
TSYY vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.45 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 3.26 | -3.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 15.28 | -16.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 2.45 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 1.05 | -1.64 |
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -21.26% | -20.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -9.80% | -17.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -0.51% | -36.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -2.77% | -23.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 2.09% | +12.40% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) at 2.77%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 2.77% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 9.83% | +9.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 13.06% | +18.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 18.31% | +19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 18.31% | +19.21% |
TSYY vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%, more than PEPS's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.88% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and PEPS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to PEPS (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs PEPS's -21.26%.
On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 31.83% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 31.83% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 0.88% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 0.10% for PEPS.
PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer