TSYY vs. PEPS
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and PEPS (Parametric Equity Plus ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -9.90% vs 24.79% for PEPS. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for PEPS.
Performance
TSYY vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -23.02% return, which is significantly lower than PEPS's 10.53% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- 6M
- -22.45%
- YTD
- -23.02%
- 1Y
- -9.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.20%
PEPS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 24.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.31K | $5.85K | $15.49K | |
| $760.06K | $828.41K | $1.81M |
TSYY vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -23.02% | -15.96% | -3.30% |
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 10.53% | 20.32% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and PEPS is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between TSYY and PEPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
PEPS
TSYY vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.29 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 2.31 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 10.10 | -10.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, which is greater than PEPS's maximum drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and PEPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -21.26% | -21.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.02% | -9.80% | -23.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.57% | -0.66% | -40.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -2.67% | -24.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.04% | 2.24% | +15.80% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS) at 3.85%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | PEPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 3.85% | +3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 11.00% | +6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.54% | 14.21% | +15.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 18.11% | +18.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 18.11% | +18.30% |
TSYY vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 256.16%, more than PEPS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PEPS Parametric Equity Plus ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% | 0.17% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 246.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and PEPS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to PEPS (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -42.66% vs PEPS's -21.26%.
On 1-year performance, PEPS leads with 24.79% vs -9.90% for TSYY. On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, PEPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PEPS has performed better with a 24.79% return vs -9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 246.79%, compared with 0.92% for PEPS.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 0.10% for PEPS.
PEPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and PEPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer