TSYY vs. IVVW
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and IVVW (iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TSYY is actively managed, while IVVW is passively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.29% vs 20.07% for IVVW. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IVVW.
Performance
TSYY vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.60% return, which is significantly lower than IVVW's 4.84% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVVW
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 4.84% | 11.71% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and IVVW is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between TSYY and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
IVVW
TSYY vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSYY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.61 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 3.47 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 19.13 | -19.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 2.73 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 1.07 | -1.66 |
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than IVVW's maximum drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and IVVW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -16.79% | -24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.31% | -5.81% | -21.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.69% | -0.09% | -36.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -1.75% | -24.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 1.05% | +13.44% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 1.13%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | IVVW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 1.13% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 6.07% | +13.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.77% | 7.40% | +24.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 12.66% | +24.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.52% | 12.66% | +24.86% |
TSYY vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%, more than IVVW's 19.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.70% | 18.55% | 13.72% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and IVVW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs IVVW's -16.79%.
On 1-year performance, IVVW leads with 20.07% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVVW has performed better with a 20.07% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 19.70% for IVVW.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYY and 0.25% for IVVW.
IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and IVVW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer