TSYY vs. GLDY
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and GLDY (Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -7.79% vs 6.42% for GLDY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TSYY vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -16.74% return, which is significantly lower than GLDY's -7.57% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- -16.74%
- 6M
- -20.28%
- 1Y
- -7.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDY
- 1D
- 10.92%
- 1M
- -9.36%
- YTD
- -7.57%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.74% | 13.43% |
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | -7.57% | 15.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and GLDY is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
GLDY
TSYY vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.08 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 0.25 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 1.01 | -1.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than GLDY's maximum drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and GLDY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -25.90% | -15.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.39% | -25.90% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.80% | -17.80% | -19.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.06% | -4.22% | -21.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.10% | 6.37% | +8.73% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) is 6.11%, while Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that TSYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | GLDY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 14.74% | -8.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.83% | 23.06% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.44% | 24.44% | +7.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.38% | 23.33% | +14.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.38% | 23.33% | +14.05% |
TSYY vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSYY and GLDY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TSYY vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 280.23%, more than GLDY's 50.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GLDY Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF | 50.86% | 37.38% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 280.23% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and GLDY have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLDY has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to TSYY (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs GLDY's -25.90%.
On 1-year performance, GLDY leads with 6.42% vs -7.79% for TSYY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GLDY has performed better with a 6.42% return vs -7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY and GLDY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 280.23%, compared with 50.86% for GLDY.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance.
GLDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and GLDY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer