TSYY vs. CWII
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.
Performance
TSYY vs. CWII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -15.07% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -15.07%
- 6M
- -22.69%
- 1Y
- -7.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CWII
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10,273.16%
- YTD
- 13,199.78%
- 6M
- 11,630.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -15.07% | -11.33% |
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 13,199.78% | -45.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and CWII is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
CWII
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSYY vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYY | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and CWII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -51.04% | +9.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.53% | 0.00% | -35.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.20% | -33.26% | +7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.52% | — | — |
Volatility
TSYY vs. CWII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | CWII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.28% | 13,701.30% | -13,670.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 13,701.30% | -13,664.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 13,701.30% | -13,664.13% |
TSYY vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 257.96%, more than CWII's 123.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF | 123.26% | 6.09% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 257.96% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and CWII have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CWII is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CWII is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 257.96%, compared with 123.26% for CWII.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 1.03% for CWII.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and CWII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer