TSYY vs. CSHP
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -12.16% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. TSYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
TSYY vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -17.08% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -17.08%
- 6M
- -24.28%
- 1Y
- -12.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -17.08% | -15.96% | -3.30% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and CSHP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
CSHP
TSYY vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -11.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -27.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 6.46 | -5.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 65.45 | -65.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 381.67 | -382.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -41.52%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.52% | -0.08% | -41.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.39% | -0.06% | -28.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.06% | -0.04% | -37.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -0.00% | -26.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.61% | 0.01% | +15.60% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that TSYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 0.16% | +5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.61% | 0.27% | +19.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.30% | 0.36% | +30.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 0.41% | +36.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 0.41% | +36.76% |
TSYY vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 264.21%, more than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 264.21% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYY and CSHP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSYY has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -41.52% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, CSHP leads with 3.94% vs -12.16% for TSYY. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CSHP has performed better with a 3.94% return vs -12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 264.21%, compared with 3.91% for CSHP.
TSYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer