TSYX vs. CRMG
TSYX (TSPY Lift ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSYX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
TSYX vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSYX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 6.77%
- 1M
- 10.88%
- 6M
- -53.43%
- YTD
- -64.33%
- 1Y
- -65.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYX vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 6.04% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -63.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYX and CRMG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYX vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
TSYX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
TSYX vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.85 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYX vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYX drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYX and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -79.83% | +66.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -73.90% | +72.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -41.04% | +38.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.39% | — |
Volatility
TSYX vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYX | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | 77.97% | -59.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 75.77% | -57.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.37% | 75.77% | -57.40% |
TSYX vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYX vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
TSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, while CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | 0.00% |
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 8.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYX and CRMG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSYX.
TSYX has the higher dividend yield at 8.47%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.
They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSYX and 0.75% for CRMG.
Find the right allocation for TSYX and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer