TSXU vs. FBOT
TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) and FBOT (Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x), while FBOT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. TSXU is passively managed, while FBOT is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSXU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FBOT.
Performance
TSXU vs. FBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSXU achieves a 113.38% return, which is significantly higher than FBOT's 13.96% return.
TSXU
- 1D
- -13.73%
- 1M
- 19.65%
- YTD
- 113.38%
- 6M
- 118.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBOT
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 6M
- 13.00%
- 1Y
- 33.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU vs. FBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 113.38% | 37.96% |
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | 13.96% | 2.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSXU and FBOT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSXU vs. FBOT — Risk / Return Rank
TSXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBOT
TSXU vs. FBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU) and Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF (FBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSXU | FBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSXU vs. FBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSXU drawdown since its inception was -35.62%, which is greater than FBOT's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSXU and FBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSXU | FBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.62% | -23.61% | -12.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.73% | -5.47% | -8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -5.12% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility
TSXU vs. FBOT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSXU | FBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.29% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.70% | 21.39% | +68.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.70% | 21.22% | +68.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.70% | 21.22% | +68.48% |
TSXU vs. FBOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSXU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FBOT's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSXU vs. FBOT - Dividend Comparison
TSXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than FBOT's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBOT Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF | 0.44% | 0.81% | 0.31% | 0.20% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.36% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSXU and FBOT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBOT is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBOT is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSXU.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.44% for FBOT.
TSXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FBOT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSXU and 0.50% for FBOT.
Find the right allocation for TSXU and FBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer