PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSWE.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSWE.L achieves a 13.54% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 11.13% return. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.L has underperformed TDGB.L with an annualized return of 0.54%, while TDGB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.39% annualized return.


TSWE.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.24%
6M
11.06%
YTD
13.54%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*
0.54%

TDGB.L

1D
0.57%
1M
1.85%
6M
9.77%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
17.71%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
13.54%27.64%9.78%20.41%-17.42%22.23%23.38%-61.63%-4.83%9.00%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
11.13%40.77%8.81%14.79%9.40%18.51%-2.72%8.05%-13.18%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TSWE.L and TDGB.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2016

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between TSWE.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSWE.L
TSWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSWE.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

5.79

-3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

15.45

-5.90

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSWE.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSWE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSWE.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-45.20%

-31.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-5.06%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-13.68%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-18.93%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-45.20%

-31.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.17%

0.00%

-19.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-8.11%

-23.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

1.90%

+0.90%

Volatility

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF (TSWE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 3.08%. This indicates that TSWE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSWE.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

3.08%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

8.46%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

11.09%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

14.19%

+2.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

16.10%

+11.57%

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSWE.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

TSWE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than TDGB.L's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.15%3.50%4.26%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%4.38%3.48%
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF
1.81%1.89%2.28%2.15%2.33%4.41%7.06%9.31%2.86%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSWE.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

TSWE.L tracks VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSWE.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSWE.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer