TSRS vs. FREL
TSRS (Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF) and FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) are both REIT funds - TSRS tracks the Truth Social - Yorkville American Red State REITs Index while FREL tracks the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSRS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FREL.
Performance
TSRS vs. FREL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSRS achieves a 14.12% return, which is significantly higher than FREL's 12.85% return.
TSRS
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FREL
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- YTD
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 12.72%
- 3Y*
- 9.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.66%
TSRS vs. FREL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSRS Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF | 14.12% | -0.30% |
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 12.85% | -0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSRS and FREL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSRS vs. FREL — Risk / Return Rank
TSRS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FREL
TSRS vs. FREL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF (TSRS) and Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSRS | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.55 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSRS vs. FREL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSRS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum FREL drawdown of -42.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSRS and FREL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSRS | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -42.61% | +34.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.60% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.82% | -9.89% | +8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.69% | — |
Volatility
TSRS vs. FREL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSRS | FREL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.65% | 13.82% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 18.93% | -5.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 20.71% | -7.06% |
TSRS vs. FREL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSRS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FREL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSRS vs. FREL - Dividend Comparison
TSRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than FREL's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.24% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
TSRS Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSRS and FREL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSRS.
FREL has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 1.56% for TSRS.
TSRS tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Red State REITs Index, while FREL tracks MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSRS and 0.08% for FREL.
Find the right allocation for TSRS and FREL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer