TSPY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TSPY (TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSPY returned 26.85% vs 5.55% for LQTI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSPY charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

TSPY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPY achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.63% return.

TSPY

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 4.33%
• YTD: 8.92%
• 6M: 9.09%
• 1Y: 26.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 0.63%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 5.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSPY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF	8.92%	11.94%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	0.63%	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSPY and LQTI is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

TSPY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPY

TSPY Risk / Return Rank: 69
TSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
TSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
TSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 73
TSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 31
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 29
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSPY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	1.10	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	1.60	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.19	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	1.64	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.47	5.02	+7.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSPY vs. LQTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the LQTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPY and LQTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSPY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	1.10	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.16	0.94	+0.21

Drawdowns

TSPY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPY drawdown since its inception was -18.02%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSPY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.02%	-3.41%	-14.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-3.41%	-6.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.39%	-0.97%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-0.88%	-1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.11%	+1.05%

Volatility

TSPY vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison

TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TSPY) has a higher volatility of 2.55% compared to FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI) at 1.67%. This indicates that TSPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSPY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	1.67%	+0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.72%	4.04%	+4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	5.12%	+6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.04%	5.97%	+10.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	5.97%	+10.07%

TSPY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPY has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSPY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

TSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.71%, more than LQTI's 9.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.07%	7.01%	0.00%
TSPY TappAlpha S&P 500 Growth & Daily Income ETF	13.71%	13.69%	3.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSPY and LQTI in my portfolio?

TSPY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSPY or LQTI?

TSPY has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to LQTI (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPY dropped -18.02% vs LQTI's -3.41%.

Which ETF is better, TSPY or LQTI?

On 1-year performance, TSPY leads with 26.85% vs 5.55% for LQTI. On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LQTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSPY or LQTI?

Over the 1-year period, TSPY has performed better with a 26.85% return vs 5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSPY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for TSPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSPY or LQTI?

TSPY has the higher dividend yield at 13.71%, compared with 9.07% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between TSPY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for TSPY and 0.65% for LQTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.