PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPX vs. PTIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSPX vs. PTIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPX achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly lower than PTIN's 16.34% return.


TSPX

1D
0.71%
1M
0.38%
6M
6.90%
YTD
7.79%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.44%

PTIN

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.27%
6M
9.19%
YTD
16.34%
1Y
32.43%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$300.58K$334.58K$457.99K
$393.88$1.58M$538.56K

TSPX vs. PTIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSPX and PTIN is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.67

The correlation between TSPX and PTIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSPX vs. PTIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSPX
TSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSPX vs. PTIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSPXPTINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.34

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

2.80

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

10.30

-0.63

TSPX vs. PTIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PTIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPX and PTIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSPX vs. PTIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPX drawdown since its inception was -7.80%, smaller than the maximum PTIN drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPX and PTIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPXPTINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-21.27%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-11.55%

+4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-2.02%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-7.56%

+6.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

3.13%

-1.54%

Volatility

TSPX vs. PTIN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) is 2.87%, while Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that TSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSPXPTINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

5.26%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

15.77%

-7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.90%

17.72%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.86%

14.74%

-3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.86%

14.12%

-3.26%

TSPX vs. PTIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than PTIN's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSPX vs. PTIN - Dividend Comparison

TSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than PTIN's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.18%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
1.99%2.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSPX and PTIN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to TSPX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPX dropped -7.80% vs PTIN's -21.27%.

On 1-year performance, PTIN leads with 32.43% vs 16.67% for TSPX. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, TSPX has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 32.43% return vs 16.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSPX.

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 1.99% for TSPX.

They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSPX and 0.66% for PTIN.

PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSPX and PTIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer