PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPX vs. CAOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSPX vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPX achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.82% return.


TSPX

1D
-0.51%
1M
4.02%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.64%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CAOS

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
0.69%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSPX vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
8.22%15.46%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.82%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TSPX and CAOS is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSPX vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPX
TSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPX vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSPXCAOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.49

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.68

6.22

+8.46

TSPX vs. CAOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the CAOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPX and CAOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSPXCAOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

1.24

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

1.21

+0.56

Drawdowns

TSPX vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPX drawdown since its inception was -7.80%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPX and CAOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPXCAOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.80%

-3.60%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.81%

-0.76%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-1.07%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-0.90%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

0.30%

+1.16%

Volatility

TSPX vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison

Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.26%. This indicates that TSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSPXCAOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

0.26%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.08%

1.03%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

1.52%

+7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.80%

4.26%

+6.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.80%

4.26%

+6.54%

TSPX vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSPX vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison

TSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
1.99%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSPX and CAOS have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSPX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to CAOS (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPX dropped -7.80% vs CAOS's -3.60%.

On 1-year performance, TSPX leads with 21.31% vs 1.88% for CAOS. On fees, CAOS is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSPX has performed better with a 21.31% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAOS is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSPX.

TSPX has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

TSPX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Twin Oak and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TSPX and 0.63% for CAOS.

TSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSPX and CAOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer