TSPA vs. IWP
TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) and IWP (iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while IWP is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Growth Index. TSPA is actively managed, while IWP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSPA returned 22.03%/yr vs 15.01%/yr for IWP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSPA charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for IWP.
Performance
TSPA vs. IWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSPA achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 1.66% return.
TSPA
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWP
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
TSPA vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 9.02% | 16.44% | 26.37% | 29.95% | -18.70% | 13.72% |
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 1.66% | 8.45% | 21.86% | 25.70% | -26.90% | 8.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSPA and IWP is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between TSPA and IWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSPA vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSPA
IWP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
TSPA
IWP
Financial Services
TSPA
IWP
Communication Services
TSPA
IWP
Consumer Cyclical
TSPA
IWP
Healthcare
TSPA
IWP
Industrials
TSPA
IWP
Consumer Defensive
TSPA
IWP
Energy
TSPA
IWP
Utilities
TSPA
IWP
Basic Materials
TSPA
IWP
Real Estate
TSPA
IWP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSPA vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank
TSPA
IWP
TSPA vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSPA | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.04 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 0.19 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | 0.56 | +11.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSPA | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 0.17 | +1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.42 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
TSPA vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSPA drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPA and IWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSPA | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -56.92% | +32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -14.79% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -25.20% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -38.62% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -4.08% | +1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -9.68% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 5.08% | -3.08% |
Volatility
TSPA vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) is 3.90%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that TSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSPA | IWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 4.62% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 12.93% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 16.71% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 22.34% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 21.70% | -4.67% |
TSPA vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSPA has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSPA vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison
TSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than IWP's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWP iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.77% | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 0.78% | 1.16% | 0.98% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.50% | 0.41% | 1.16% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSPA and IWP have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWP has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to TSPA (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPA dropped -24.72% vs IWP's -56.92%.
On 3-year performance, TSPA leads with 22.03% vs 15.01% for IWP. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TSPA has performed better with a 22.03% return vs 15.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.
TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.33% for IWP.
TSPA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TSPA and 0.23% for IWP.
TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSPA and IWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer