TSPA vs. ILCG
TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while ILCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. TSPA is actively managed, while ILCG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TSPA returned 14.00%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSPA charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
TSPA vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSPA having a 9.54% return and ILCG slightly higher at 9.97%.
TSPA
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- 24.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.63%
- 5Y*
- 14.00%
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 24.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.85%
TSPA vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 9.54% | 16.44% | 26.37% | 29.95% | -18.70% | 13.26% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 9.97% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -31.75% | 17.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSPA and ILCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TSPA and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSPA vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSPA
ILCG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
TSPA
ILCG
Financial Services
TSPA
ILCG
Communication Services
TSPA
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
TSPA
ILCG
Healthcare
TSPA
ILCG
Industrials
TSPA
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
TSPA
ILCG
Energy
TSPA
ILCG
Utilities
TSPA
ILCG
Basic Materials
TSPA
ILCG
Real Estate
TSPA
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSPA vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
TSPA
ILCG
TSPA vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSPA | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 1.46 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.98 | 5.04 | +6.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSPA vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSPA drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPA and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSPA | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -52.98% | +28.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.24% | -15.65% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -23.10% | +4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -35.38% | +10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -4.92% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -8.21% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 4.51% | -2.47% |
Volatility
TSPA vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) is 4.52%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that TSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSPA | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 6.77% | -2.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 13.98% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 17.16% | -4.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 22.12% | -5.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 21.59% | -4.56% |
TSPA vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSPA has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSPA vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
TSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.50% | 0.41% | 1.16% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TSPA and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to TSPA (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPA dropped -24.72% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 5-year performance, TSPA leads with 14.00% vs 13.61% for ILCG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TSPA has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.
TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.
TSPA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ILCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TSPA and 0.04% for ILCG.
TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSPA and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer