PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSPA vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSPA vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSPA having a 9.54% return and ILCG slightly higher at 9.97%.


TSPA

1D
0.47%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
9.54%
6M
10.14%
1Y
24.31%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.00%
10Y*

ILCG

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
9.97%
6M
11.01%
1Y
22.69%
3Y*
24.07%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
17.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSPA vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
9.54%16.44%26.37%29.95%-18.70%13.26%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
9.97%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%17.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TSPA and ILCG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2021

0.95

The correlation between TSPA and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSPA vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSPA
ILCG

Technology

36.0%
49.8%

Financial Services

12.3%
6.0%

Communication Services

11.1%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.6%
5.3%

Industrials

7.7%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
1.6%

Energy

3.6%
0.5%

Utilities

2.8%
0.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.4%

Technology

TSPA
36.0%
ILCG
49.8%

Financial Services

TSPA
12.3%
ILCG
6.0%

Communication Services

TSPA
11.1%
ILCG
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

TSPA
10.0%
ILCG
10.6%

Healthcare

TSPA
8.6%
ILCG
5.3%

Industrials

TSPA
7.7%
ILCG
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

TSPA
4.7%
ILCG
1.6%

Energy

TSPA
3.6%
ILCG
0.5%

Utilities

TSPA
2.8%
ILCG
0.8%

Basic Materials

TSPA
1.8%
ILCG
1.1%

Real Estate

TSPA
1.7%
ILCG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSPA vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPA
TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPA vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSPAILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.46

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.98

5.04

+6.93

TSPA vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPA and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSPA vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPA drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPA and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSPAILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.72%

-52.98%

+28.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-15.65%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

-23.10%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-35.38%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-4.92%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-8.21%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

4.51%

-2.47%

Volatility

TSPA vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) is 4.52%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that TSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSPAILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

6.77%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

13.98%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

17.16%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

22.12%

-5.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

21.59%

-4.56%

TSPA vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPA has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSPA vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

TSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than ILCG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
0.57%0.62%0.50%0.41%1.16%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, TSPA and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ILCG has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to TSPA (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPA dropped -24.72% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 5-year performance, TSPA leads with 14.00% vs 13.61% for ILCG. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TSPA has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TSPA has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.

TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.42% for ILCG.

TSPA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ILCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TSPA and 0.04% for ILCG.

TSPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSPA and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer