TSNIX vs. FDTRX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Science & Technology Fund I Class (TSNIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX).
TSNIX is an actively managed fund by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Mar 23, 2016. FDTRX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013.
Performance
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSNIX T. Rowe Price Science & Technology Fund I Class | -11.15% | 24.45% | 40.65% | 53.94% | -35.29% | 5.72% | 46.10% | 55.54% | -7.41% | 39.56% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | -15.17% | 18.97% | 31.01% | 44.92% | -40.07% | 12.90% | 58.22% | 36.84% | 3.22% | 39.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSNIX achieves a -11.15% return, which is significantly higher than FDTRX's -15.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TSNIX has outperformed FDTRX with an annualized return of 18.63%, while FDTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.79% annualized return.
TSNIX
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -13.59%
- YTD
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -8.09%
- 1Y
- 31.06%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.74%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
FDTRX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -9.28%
- YTD
- -15.17%
- 6M
- -15.64%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSNIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FDTRX's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TSNIX vs. FDTRX — Risk / Return Rank
TSNIX
FDTRX
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Science & Technology Fund I Class (TSNIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSNIX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.56 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 0.98 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.13 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.49 | +0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.79 | 1.61 | +3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSNIX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.56 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.22 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.65 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.65 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between TSNIX and FDTRX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Dividend Comparison
TSNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.13%, more than FDTRX's 12.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSNIX T. Rowe Price Science & Technology Fund I Class | 13.13% | 11.66% | 9.62% | 0.00% | 7.82% | 33.71% | 14.00% | 11.91% | 36.28% | 13.35% | 3.82% | 0.00% |
FDTRX Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 | 12.24% | 10.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 2.80% | 1.71% | 3.44% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSNIX drawdown since its inception was -46.22%, roughly equal to the maximum FDTRX drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSNIX and FDTRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSNIX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.22% | -48.10% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.97% | -20.39% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.22% | -48.10% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.22% | -48.10% | +1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.97% | -20.39% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -9.22% | +0.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 6.24% | -0.88% |
Volatility
TSNIX vs. FDTRX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Science & Technology Fund I Class (TSNIX) has a higher volatility of 8.82% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund Class R6 (FDTRX) at 7.58%. This indicates that TSNIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TSNIX | FDTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.82% | 7.58% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.50% | 16.06% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.35% | 26.05% | +1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.37% | 26.20% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 24.48% | +0.06% |