PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMZ vs. MSDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -38.97% return, which is significantly higher than MSDD's -48.72% return.


TSMZ

1D
-0.98%
1M
-15.14%
YTD
-38.97%
6M
-41.14%
1Y
-59.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSDD

1D
0.00%
1M
44.94%
YTD
-48.72%
6M
-40.94%
1Y
71.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSMZ
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares
-38.97%-34.00%
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
-48.72%274.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMZ and MSDD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMZ vs. MSDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMZ
TSMZ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TSMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MSDD
MSDD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMZMSDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.21

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

0.84

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

1.67

-3.32

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.58, which is lower than the MSDD Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMZ and MSDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -73.32%, smaller than the maximum MSDD drawdown of -84.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and MSDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMZMSDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.32%

-84.91%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.01%

-84.91%

+25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.32%

-68.63%

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-31.11%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.95%

42.92%

-6.97%

Volatility

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) is 13.95%, while GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) has a volatility of 32.23%. This indicates that TSMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMZMSDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.95%

32.23%

-18.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.48%

124.69%

-95.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

141.22%

-103.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.91%

139.12%

-98.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.91%

139.12%

-98.21%

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than MSDD's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMZ vs. MSDD - Dividend Comparison

TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, while MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MSDD
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSMZ
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares
5.74%4.88%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMZ and MSDD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSDD has higher volatility (32.23%) compared to TSMZ (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -73.32% vs MSDD's -84.91%.

On 1-year performance, MSDD leads with 71.30% vs -59.11% for TSMZ. On fees, TSMZ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TSMZ has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MSDD has performed better with a 71.30% return vs -59.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMZ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 1.50% for MSDD.

MSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.51 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMZ and MSDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer