TSMZ vs. FLTW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while FLTW is a Taiwan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. TSMZ is actively managed, while FLTW is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -52.29% vs 99.33% for FLTW. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -35.32% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 69.44% return.

TSMZ

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -4.73%
• 6M: -30.97%
• YTD: -35.32%
• 1Y: -52.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTW

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 62.60%
• YTD: 69.44%
• 1Y: 99.33%
• 3Y*: 42.23%
• 5Y*: 21.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	-35.32%	-41.91%	-11.25%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	69.44%	32.00%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMZ and FLTW is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.74

The correlation between TSMZ and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSMZ vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMZ

TSMZ Risk / Return Rank: 1
TSMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMZ	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.34	3.34	-4.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.19	3.68	-5.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	1.53	-0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.93	9.12	-10.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.57	25.45	-27.02

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.34, which is lower than the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMZ and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMZ	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.02%	-38.00%	-36.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.52%	-10.87%	-45.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.73%	-5.72%	-66.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.59%	-8.39%	-31.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.35%	3.89%	+29.46%

Volatility

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) has a higher volatility of 17.38% compared to Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) at 13.61%. This indicates that TSMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMZ	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.38%	13.61%	+3.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.71%	26.28%	+5.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.31%	29.69%	+9.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.59%	23.47%	+18.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.59%	22.31%	+19.28%

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMZ vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than FLTW's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.59%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	4.66%	4.88%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMZ and FLTW in my portfolio?

TSMZ and FLTW have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMZ or FLTW?

TSMZ has higher volatility (17.38%) compared to FLTW (13.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -74.02% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

Which ETF is better, TSMZ or FLTW?

On 1-year performance, FLTW leads with 99.33% vs -52.29% for TSMZ. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLTW has been the lower-risk option at 13.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMZ or FLTW?

Over the 1-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 99.33% return vs -52.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMZ or FLTW?

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMZ or FLTW?

TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 1.59% for FLTW.

What is the main difference between TSMZ and FLTW?

TSMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FLTW is Taiwan Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.19% for FLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.