TSMZ vs. EMXC
TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. TSMZ is actively managed, while EMXC is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -48.22% vs 50.99% for EMXC. Their -0.72 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -31.34% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 27.50% return.
TSMZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- 6M
- -24.87%
- YTD
- -31.34%
- 1Y
- -48.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.42%
EMXC
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- YTD
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 50.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $245.04M | $277.03M | $277.07M | |
| $787.65K | $1.02M | $750.23K |
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | -31.34% | -41.91% | -11.25% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 27.50% | 35.14% | -7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMZ and EMXC is -0.77, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.72 |
The correlation between TSMZ and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.77 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMZ vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
TSMZ
EMXC
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMZ | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.34 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 2.74 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 9.76 | -11.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMZ | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.02% | -42.81% | -31.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.52% | -18.43% | -38.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.99% | -13.49% | -56.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -10.15% | -30.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.46% | 5.17% | +30.29% |
Volatility
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) at 10.83%. This indicates that TSMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMZ | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.51% | 10.83% | +3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | 25.90% | +7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.76% | 27.60% | +13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 19.04% | +22.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 20.50% | +21.46% |
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMZ vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than EMXC's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.09% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | 4.39% | 4.88% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMZ and EMXC have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMZ has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to EMXC (10.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -74.02% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 1-year performance, EMXC leads with 50.99% vs -48.22% for TSMZ. On fees, EMXC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EMXC has been the lower-risk option at 10.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EMXC has performed better with a 50.99% return vs -48.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.
TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 2.09% for EMXC.
TSMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMZ and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer