TSMZ vs. CHPS
TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. TSMZ is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -48.22% vs 137.92% for CHPS. Their -0.72 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.
Performance
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -31.34% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 68.49% return.
TSMZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- 6M
- -24.87%
- YTD
- -31.34%
- 1Y
- -48.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.42%
CHPS
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -13.02%
- 6M
- 42.22%
- YTD
- 68.49%
- 1Y
- 137.92%
- 3Y*
- 46.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 46.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.30M | $2.47M | $3.85M | |
| $787.65K | $1.02M | $750.23K |
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | -31.34% | -41.91% | -11.25% |
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 68.49% | 58.47% | -5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMZ and CHPS is -0.74, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.72 |
The correlation between TSMZ and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.74 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMZ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank
TSMZ
CHPS
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMZ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.42 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 4.14 | -4.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | 17.64 | -18.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and CHPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMZ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.02% | -39.44% | -34.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.52% | -32.74% | -23.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.99% | -26.00% | -43.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -9.36% | -31.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.46% | 7.66% | +27.80% |
Volatility
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) is 14.51%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that TSMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMZ | CHPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.51% | 19.82% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | 40.35% | -7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.76% | 45.70% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 37.29% | +4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 37.29% | +4.67% |
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMZ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison
TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than CHPS's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.39% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% |
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | 4.39% | 4.88% | 0.86% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMZ and CHPS have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPS has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to TSMZ (14.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -74.02% vs CHPS's -39.44%.
On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 137.92% vs -48.22% for TSMZ. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TSMZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 137.92% return vs -48.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.
TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 0.39% for CHPS.
TSMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.15% for CHPS.
CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMZ and CHPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer