TSMZ vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSMZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. TSMZ is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -59.11% vs 231.91% for CHPS. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -38.97% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 127.70% return.

TSMZ

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -15.14%
• YTD: -38.97%
• 6M: -41.14%
• 1Y: -59.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: 2.67%
• 1M: 25.08%
• YTD: 127.70%
• 6M: 129.64%
• 1Y: 231.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	-38.97%	-41.91%	-11.25%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	127.70%	58.47%	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMZ and CHPS is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024	-0.71

The correlation between TSMZ and CHPS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.71 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSMZ vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMZ

TSMZ Risk / Return Rank: 0
TSMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
TSMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSMZ	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.58	6.03	-7.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.75	5.43	-8.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.70	1.75	-1.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	13.35	-14.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.65	49.59	-51.25

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.58, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 6.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMZ and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -73.32%, which is greater than CHPS's maximum drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMZ	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.32%	-39.44%	-33.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.01%	-17.50%	-41.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.32%	0.00%	-73.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.61%	-9.08%	-29.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.95%	4.70%	+31.25%

Volatility

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) is 13.95%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 20.16%. This indicates that TSMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMZ	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.95%	20.16%	-6.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.48%	32.86%	-3.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.56%	38.78%	-1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.91%	35.16%	+5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.91%	35.16%	+5.75%

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMZ vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than CHPS's 0.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.29%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares	5.74%	4.88%	0.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMZ and CHPS in my portfolio?

TSMZ and CHPS have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMZ or CHPS?

CHPS has higher volatility (20.16%) compared to TSMZ (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -73.32% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

Which ETF is better, TSMZ or CHPS?

On 1-year performance, CHPS leads with 231.91% vs -59.11% for TSMZ. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TSMZ has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMZ or CHPS?

Over the 1-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 231.91% return vs -59.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMZ or CHPS?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMZ or CHPS?

TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.29% for CHPS.

What is the main difference between TSMZ and CHPS?

TSMZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.15% for CHPS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.03 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.