TSMY vs. RYLG

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) and RYLG (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TSMY is actively managed, while RYLG is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMY returned 79.40% vs 28.05% for RYLG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSMY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RYLG.

Performance

TSMY vs. RYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMY achieves a 30.41% return, which is significantly higher than RYLG's 10.85% return.

TSMY

• 1D: -5.99%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: 30.41%
• 6M: 32.21%
• 1Y: 79.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RYLG

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 10.21%
• 1Y: 28.05%
• 3Y*: 11.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMY vs. RYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF	30.41%	41.00%	8.15%
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF	10.85%	9.39%	4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMY and RYLG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024	0.48

Return for Risk

TSMY vs. RYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMY

TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 83
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 77
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

RYLG

RYLG Risk / Return Rank: 64
RYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMY vs. RYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSMY	RYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	1.88	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	2.63	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.33	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.15	3.44	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.03	13.24	+5.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSMY vs. RYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the RYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMY and RYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSMY	RYLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	1.88	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.41	0.60	+0.81

Drawdowns

TSMY vs. RYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMY drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, which is greater than RYLG's maximum drawdown of -22.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMY and RYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSMY	RYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.15%	-22.37%	-8.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-8.18%	-7.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.14%	-2.38%	-3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-4.13%	-1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	2.12%	+2.07%

Volatility

TSMY vs. RYLG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a higher volatility of 10.36% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF (RYLG) at 4.41%. This indicates that TSMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSMY	RYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.36%	4.41%	+5.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.56%	10.91%	+12.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.51%	15.02%	+14.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.47%	17.19%	+16.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.47%	17.19%	+16.28%

TSMY vs. RYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSMY vs. RYLG - Dividend Comparison

TSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.24%, more than RYLG's 10.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RYLG Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF	10.49%	10.82%	23.73%	5.78%	4.36%
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF	56.24%	56.76%	13.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSMY and RYLG in my portfolio?

TSMY and RYLG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSMY or RYLG?

TSMY has higher volatility (10.36%) compared to RYLG (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMY dropped -31.15% vs RYLG's -22.37%.

Which ETF is better, TSMY or RYLG?

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 79.40% vs 28.05% for RYLG. On fees, RYLG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RYLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSMY or RYLG?

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 79.40% return vs 28.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSMY or RYLG?

RYLG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSMY or RYLG?

TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 56.24%, compared with 10.49% for RYLG.

What is the main difference between TSMY and RYLG?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSMY and 0.35% for RYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.